For articles or cons Sponsored
Seen 1.280 times 
I asked a question recently regarding sponsored articles seen on multiple blogs in recent months, a trade paying enough for webmasters, it already allows them to keep their website (blog) with fresh articles on average an article a day or two even if that pace is a little hard to follow that has to work next.
There are now even that run affiliate governed through this system, the example of BuzzParadise . The question arises, are you for or against this practice? This can have harmful consequences for referencing and / or quality of items?
Loading ... 
I personally am neither for nor against! On the one hand, it must be that webmasters make their living and if sponsorisassions does not change their stories or ideas, no problem. Now governed and especially advertisers could benefit by making the vein may own idea circulated without the webmasters do not realize it (APPA ¢ t gain).
That's all!
I am against in my case and I know I'm disappointed when I read an article sponsored. For me as a blogger is a journalist: he can talk about the product or service if it has an interest to its readers, but it should not be paid. Otherwise it gets the gear. Make more items to make more money and ultimately people do not comment more because the frequency of publication and quality of their tickets should flashplaygames.net not ® t more.
I thank you for your feedback
Regarding the articles sponsored, it is clear that once started with only one sponsored article, we stay "r there will be a 2nd and a 3rd etc. ... at the end, you end up with 75% of sponsored articles, unfortunately that is the case for most good but there are always exceptions, according to an article sponsored by month, it still should not interfere and see the topic but if it becomes regular, one article every 2/3 days there is another thing